Most users ever online was 263 on 2020-Apr-18 20:02
Users in total:
Newest user:
25 users online:
19,519
Mr_you
AhmdElonsndME2MarsRYvr- 10 minutes ago

Any unrated live?

AhmdElonsndME2MarsRYvr- 12 hours ago

Sure , unrated one's*

AhmdElonsndME2MarsRYvr- 12 hours ago

Mens underwear one's where u win or die??

AhmdElonsndME2MarsRYvr- 12 hours ago

Any host free live games??

Irishadam2 16 hours ago

2/3

Irishadam2 17 hours ago

1/3

JaqenHghar0 17 hours ago

3p lice someone?

Phobey 17 hours ago

i was unable as im in a game already, round 9 now, will do several once we finishthe game

AhmdElonsndME2MarsRYvr- 18 hours ago

Where'?

Phobey 18 hours ago

sure 3p ?

AhmdElonsndME2MarsRYvr- 18 hours ago

Maybe some host free live to??

AhmdElonsndME2MarsRYvr- 19 hours ago

Any live games?

Lord Crook 20 hours ago

2/3

Lord Crook 20 hours ago

3 live up

JaqenHghar0 20 hours ago

i missed it 3 times man

Lord Crook 21 hours ago

3 live up

Lord Crook 21 hours ago

were ready

Lord Crook 21 hours ago

fedda?

fedda 21 hours ago

3p live is up

Bob Schillaci 21 hours ago

3p live up

Sovereign...? Naaaah!



Community Forum
Search |  


12
Author
Message
tworiverstabac
One Of The Kingsguard

Posts: 353
Games: 158
Rank Points: 757
Member since: 2014-Nov-24

Topic: Tyrell NOT taking the Reach
Posted: 2017-Oct-22 01:50
ive noticed in a lot of 6p games Tyrell players do not take the Reach, allowing baratheon to consolidate power uncontested. This usually leads to bara taking the reach and blackwater, with unraidable support in kingslanding.

why do people not take the reach?


ArchDemon
King's Councillor

Posts: 122
Games: 309
Rank Points: 2,658
Member since: 2015-Dec-25

Topic: Tyrell NOT taking the Reach
Posted: 2017-Oct-22 05:10
I am going to need examples if you want a smart answer.
Generally, Tyrell should never take it round 1, but only after muster comes or clash +tuen to CP* (not enough units otherwise).
Otherwise, Tyrell might agree to give TR away for help against Martel or diplomatic help against GJ.
Otherwise, a mistake
tworiverstabac
One Of The Kingsguard

Posts: 353
Games: 158
Rank Points: 757
Member since: 2014-Nov-24

Topic: Tyrell NOT taking the Reach
Posted: 2017-Oct-22 06:52
i wholeheartedly disagree. Tyrell must take the reach turn 1 to be viable. its a needed check on baratheon.

see here, the winner of the council tourney, tyrell, took reach turn 1
https://game.thronemaster.net/?review=1&game=81312


tworiverstabac
One Of The Kingsguard

Posts: 353
Games: 158
Rank Points: 757
Member since: 2014-Nov-24

Topic: Tyrell NOT taking the Reach
Posted: 2017-Oct-22 06:55
tyrell has a duty to keep marty and bara in check. maybe im just stuck in my 1st ed 5p ways...


Harakon
Grandmaester of Reports

Posts: 3,634
Games: 903
Rank Points: 3,430
Member since: 2014-Aug-24

Topic: Tyrell NOT taking the Reach
Posted: 2017-Oct-22 10:18
One game proofs nothing.when you take our top tourney as sample then you need to check the flow if every game and how it developed.

Also what is the trade off?
Do you want to consolidate power early on or hope for an early muster?


Cornie4ever
Warden Of The North

Posts: 213
Games: 218
Rank Points: 1,896
Member since: 2016-Apr-14

Topic: Tyrell NOT taking the Reach
Posted: 2017-Oct-22 12:38
Reach in turn 1 is an interesting opening for Tyrell. It is bad for Tyrell because Tyrell is better of going to Arbor and taking Power faster which gives much higher winning chances to Tyrell. And it is even worse for Baratheon.

So ArchDemon is right. Taking Reach turn 1 is a mistake. Bad for Tyrell, bad for Bara. Giving an advantage to other 4 houses. EDIT - rather 3 houses because Tyrell in Reach is also annoying for Lanni.

It is not Baratheon Tyrell should be worried about. It is survival in early phase and taking power which is a priority for Tyrell.


ArchDemon
King's Councillor

Posts: 122
Games: 309
Rank Points: 2,658
Member since: 2015-Dec-25

Topic: Tyrell NOT taking the Reach
Posted: 2017-Oct-22 15:04
I think Tyrell made a mistake in the game you ahowed but he got lucky.
Muster rarely comes round 1, but since it did come, taking TR was good
Duckfield
King's Councillor

Posts: 134
Games: 382
Rank Points: 2,603
Member since: 2016-Nov-24

Topic: Tyrell NOT taking the Reach
Posted: 2017-Oct-22 15:56
It could be right for Tyrell to take TR if Baratheon goes for KL in turn 1. However, this is a suboptimal gamble by Baratheon, and it definitely breeds animosity. Generally not preferable R1.
tworiverstabac
One Of The Kingsguard

Posts: 353
Games: 158
Rank Points: 757
Member since: 2014-Nov-24

Topic: Tyrell NOT taking the Reach
Posted: 2017-Oct-22 16:27
Reach in turn 1 is an interesting opening for Tyrell. It is bad for Tyrell because Tyrell is better of going to Arbor and taking Power faster which gives much higher winning chances to Tyrell. And it is even worse for Baratheon.
but tyrell can consolidate in dornish turn 1, id hardly say they are power starved.if they go for arbor, they are never going to accumulate as much power as baratheon can, uncontested, from kingslanding, kingswood, and dragonstone. i feel they are far better off preventing bara from accumulating that power.

and if bara strikes the reach early in hostility, good. easier to convince the other houses to crush him. perfect scenario for stark. i love when im stark and bara gets entangled in a land struggle, makes it easier for me to invade shipbreaker and all that comes with it

****also huge disclaimer here that i should have said from the get go, i NEVER play with second edition orders, so consolidate muster is not a thing in my games, so bara always takes kl in turn one. does this change anyone's thoughts? because i understand in most 2nd ed games bara will almost always play special cp in dragonstone turn 1.


tworiverstabac
One Of The Kingsguard

Posts: 353
Games: 158
Rank Points: 757
Member since: 2014-Nov-24

Topic: Tyrell NOT taking the Reach
Posted: 2017-Oct-22 16:29
One game proofs nothing.when you take our top tourney as sample then you need to check the flow if every game and how it developed.
have i got a bad case of confirmation bias


ElPopelos
Keeper of the Forbidden Wilds

Posts: 3,874
Games: 179
Rank Points: 1,271
Member since: 2013-Feb-01

Topic: Tyrell NOT taking the Reach
Posted: 2017-Oct-22 20:40
You should stop making  posts at once

Feel free to use the edit button.

I agree with Cornie and Arch here. Oldtown is a must and Tyrell wont be able top do anything without a clash anyways.

If he goes for the Reach in round 2, he cant make any use from it in round 2. He cant consolidate and he has nowhere to go since he lacks backup to go against Lannister  and attacking Bara at this point doesnt make any sense either.


tworiverstabac
One Of The Kingsguard

Posts: 353
Games: 158
Rank Points: 757
Member since: 2014-Nov-24

Topic: Tyrell NOT taking the Reach
Posted: 2017-Oct-22 20:48
You should stop making  posts at once
You'll have to put me to the sword before that happens, ser!


Bround
Knight

Posts: 23
Games: 207
Rank Points: 716
Member since: 2017-Feb-08

Topic: Tyrell NOT taking the Reach
Posted: 2017-Oct-22 21:12
Usually I don't take reach (sometimes do, just for a change). Problem though is, if you don't take it quickly, another faction will think it's theirs as it's empty, and take it. Once that happens it might be hard to kick them out, and bara might be tempted to push forward to highgarden, locking tyrell and bara in an inopportune war.

If you find yourself closed in on land, with lanny in searoad and bara in reach, it can be very hard to ever establish some presence on land. I know most good tyrel players will try to win over seas anyway, going after grejoy, but this is not always possible.

So sometimes I take either reach or searoad (searoad if gj fights lanny) first turn, so I have more options to expand on land.
Lrich
One Of The Kingsguard

Posts: 8
Games: 222
Rank Points: 978
Member since: 2014-Apr-18

Topic: Tyrell NOT taking the Reach
Posted: 2017-Nov-02 16:16
Tyrell taking reach turn 1 is a bit of a mistake, in my personal opinion. Tyrell should be looking to consolidate power and build up in the early stages of the game in alignment with their house words, “Growing Strong”. My typical first turn move with Tyrell is to consolidate on DM, march on boat, and march knight to Oldtown and footman to the Arbor. The sooner you are making money/mustering(if the event decks allow), the sooner you are relevant and can start pushing out.
Nomaris
Maester without a chain

Posts: 2,615
Games: 413
Rank Points: 2,767
Member since: 2017-May-19

Topic: Tyrell NOT taking the Reach
Posted: 2017-Nov-02 17:37
As I see, many of you move a footman to the Arbor, which I also like to do occasionally. But I want to point out that this leaves you even more vulnerable to a round 2 naval assault by Martell. So if Martell seems to be aggressive, but relations to baratheon are good, it may be better to go to the Reach and put a support there in round 2.


Bround
Knight

Posts: 23
Games: 207
Rank Points: 716
Member since: 2017-Feb-08

Topic: Tyrell NOT taking the Reach
Posted: 2017-Nov-02 18:14
Last game I played Tyrell, Martell made pretty clear he was going to attack me.
So I moved the knight to oldtown and attacked martell's footman in starfall with my footman. Bit of a rash move, but I don't like to be passively led to the slaughter bank.

I killed the footman with garlan, he doranned me on fiefdoms. From there I had good position to quickly move further into dorne, while martell could play one less order token next turn (which slows him down).

I think there was mustering + clash of kings in turn 2 though, so I couldn't get more fortunate.
12

Please log in to use the reply function.
toast