Most users ever online was 263 on 2020-Apr-18 20:02
Users in total:
Newest user:
36 users online:
21,973
LordArryn
snufkin_1301 56 minutes ago

4 pl all here lets start

Les sept couronnes 1 h 34 min ago

4/5

Soda-can 1 h 40 min ago

Dosuljsydd?

Les sept couronnes 1 h 44 min ago

3/5

NIghtCrawler 2 h 11 min ago

I created one!

Les sept couronnes 2 h 31 min ago

Please 5 players no live game

Tully Trouble 4 hours ago

Ukrainian friend, please join us

Tully Trouble 4 hours ago

2/3 - 6 rounds only, preceding mustering

Tully Trouble 4 hours ago

Maximus - come play with us

Les sept couronnes 6 hours ago

4 players live free choice please.

King Nero 7 hours ago

2/3

Daredevil Z 10 hours ago

5/6

Daredevil Z 11 hours ago

3/6

Soda-can 11 hours ago

Dysuljsydd?

Nicky 13 hours ago

Anyone 3p live?

Soda-can 13 hours ago

thanks Necrarch done that, weirdly it was only aborted without votetooick but I still received pone

Daredevil Z 16 hours ago

2/3, one more to go

Daredevil Z 16 hours ago

3p live up

Tiguera 21 hours ago

3p on

Necrarch 22 hours ago

Kicks are removed when you finish well games. JUstified or not, that's not you to tell but the judges - if you think it was not justified, report it.

Spider-Pig, Spider-Pig, ...



Community Forum
Search |  


12
Author
Message
JukeboxHero
Stonemason's Apprentice

Posts: 25
Games: 17
Rank Points: 22
Member since: 2017-Jul-18

Topic: Ranking House Decks as a Whole
Posted: 2018-Jun-03 15:37
Love the theorycrafting and analyses of the different cards on here, and thought I'd give two cents on the decks as a whole.  As a fighting-game lover, I'm going to classify the decks into tiers and see what other's thoughts are.

S+ Tier Decks
Martell

What can't this deck do? It has the best deterrent in the game in the form of Doran--a veritable scorpion raising it's stinger for your attack.  It has admirable defensive measures (Areo, depsite being a fairly meh card for a 3, is great on those battles where you're guessing the play, but still want to be safe), but really shines on offense, as it's the only house with up to 5 swords in the deck.  Let's not forget Red Viper either--clearly one of the top 4 cards in the game. Overall a jack of all trades and Master of Offense deck.

S Tier Decks
Tyrell

Another fantastic deck.  Mace is a strong card, Loras is terrifying at the right time, and Queen of Thorns can have powerful repercussions at critical moments.  You add in a sprinkling of respectable 1 and 2 cards and you have the true jack of all trades deck.  However, in my estimation, it just doesn't quite match nor exceed Martell--particularly in one key area: deterrence.

Hypothetical:  I have a strong attack coming at you(Tyrell) where we are close to evenly matched involving no footmen.  What do you do?  If this area is really important will you risk using Loras--and wasting his best ability?  Will you risk Mace--even though you aren't using him to his fullest potential? And what if you do use either of them--what did you gain?  Well, you kept your area for one turn, but you have caused no casualties, and if another strong attack comes again...then what?  Can your counter attack wait another turn?

Therein lies the biggest problem--Tyrell forces opponents to play safe--or at least in a certain manner--but once your opponent adjusts it can be difficult to get the advantage that Mace is designed for--granted, Loras nonetheless is a terrifying prospect--particularly at the right moment.

Stark

A simple, but very effective deck.  Eddard is a punishing beast that can decimate on attack or defense.  Robb is a respectable 3 card with a useful ability.  Roose is the backbone of the deck--making Stark one of the consistently more dangerous foes merely because of the at-will refresh options.  Catlynn is treated as waste (perhaps fairly, perhaps not), but with Rodrick and the Blackfish, you have a deck that allows your troops to survive the worst attacks and counter attack with Eddard to punish incursions.  Not quite as good as Tyrell--as it lacks the flexibility of Queen of Thorns and the threat and unpredictability of Loras--but still excellent.

Greyjoy

Another straight-forward deck.  It does one thing really well--win battles.  If I had to sum up what Grejoy's deck's thought process it would have to be:  Win this battle now, and hope I'll be stronger next turn.  Greyjoy's offensive options are so good, but they really need to be--given where he is on the three tracks, as Greyjoy absolutely must use the early game strength to get into an advantageous position for (hopefully) an early muster, or to get up a few tracks on the impending clash.  The deck mostly speaks for itself.

Need to win the seas?  Done.
Need to win no matter what on an even fight? Done.
Need to deal some damage--or at least threaten it? Done.

While there are some very ho-hum cards (Asha, Theon) nothing stands out as a liability, and that speaks to the strangth of the deck.

A Tier Decks

Lannister

Lannister actually has a very good deck with two major problems: it's nearest neighbors (GJ & Tyrell) have much more flexible decks, and nearly all of her cards--in order to be most effective--have some inflexibility to them.

Tywin is a great card--two power tokens--particularly in a close game--is nothing to turn your nose up at; it just isn't as sexy as a couple swords.

Gregor is the beacon of hope for the deck and can single handedly decimate armies--but he suffers from the Tyrell issue of opponents adjusting because of him by keeping forces spread out rather than together or turtling to prevent a wipe and attacking in overwhelming force to guarantee the win.  When he comes through--if the situation presents itself--it's awe-inspiring.

Hound: A great defensive option, but all your eggs are literally in one basket.  Do I use him now--or will it be more crucial later?

Kevan: MUST be attacking...and with Footmen.  Potential is very strong, but, again, very situational.

The remaining cards speak for themselves--if the situation calls for them to be effective--they really can be, but if it doesn't...well, hopefully you can out strategize.

B Tier Decks

Baratheon

Just a puzzling deck--a jack of...no trades? It can't seem to decide what it wants to be.  Deterrence? Patchface for sure and...Salladhor, I guess?  Good defense?  Well, no, not really...Salladhor, I guess?.  Good Offense? Potentially, but limited as you lose any initiative advantage to gain it.  Davos is the only redeeming part of the deck, but even then there just aren't any teeth to it.  I suppose something could be said about King's Landing giving Baratheon a power generation advantage--which helps on the tracks--which subsequently helps in battles--but that's a bit too much theory-crafting for ruminations on decks.  Overall, this deck just misses the mark.  It has some good pieces, but as a whole, it's underwhelming.

So, there you go.  Feel free to disagree, discuss... what are other's thoughts?
pppoe
Squire

Posts: 30
Games: 82
Rank Points: 484
Member since: 2018-Mar-03

Topic: Ranking House Decks as a Whole
Posted: 2018-Jun-03 15:56
Well the actual strength of your house cards are reflected in random position games.GJ and Martell's decks are the best.Though Tyrell is the weakest house in random position games,it is due to her bad track position at the very beginning instead of her house cards.Lanni,Bara,Stark are balanced.
Dies Irae
Battle Commander

Posts: 122
Games: 239
Rank Points: 1,197
Member since: 2017-Oct-06

Topic: Ranking House Decks as a Whole
Posted: 2018-Jun-04 13:04
While I generally agree with the assessment, I'd move GJ to S+ to the Martell level and move Lannister down to B, although still above Baratheon. That would make A tier empty, however I find that it would properly represent the gap between the decks.
ajant
Blacksmith's Apprentice

Posts: 148
Games: 34
Rank Points: 88
Member since: 2014-May-31

Topic: Ranking House Decks as a Whole
Posted: 2018-Jun-04 20:44
i'm a bit higher on deterring ability of patchface and salador, but otherwise bara is pretty uninspiring, with lack of towers and swords and even stannis/davos bonuses are not the easiest ones to use

martel has arguably the top o, 1 & 4 cards, but also arguably worst 2 & 3 cards

tyrell has the best card in the game, plus very good 0 and solid 1,2 & 4

stark in random would be a better deck then in regular games, but roose/eddard combo is pretty impressive

lannie has some potentially great cards, that are hard to use

greyjoy is solid across the board, but balon and victarion are among the easiest powerful cars to use

i would rank them like this:
1. tyrell
2. martel
3. greyjoy
4. stark
5. lannie
6. bara

this makes for relatively well balanced game, as bara has easiest time of consolidating and getting initial castles, tyrell starts with worst tracks position, but best deck, martel with worst board position, but good deck, stark has plenty of room to expand to with average deck and gj has good cards to combine with the sword. lannie imo has the worst combo of starting position/cards/track position


Zsa
Knight

Posts: 83
Games: 79
Rank Points: 685
Member since: 2017-Sep-01

Topic: Ranking House Decks as a Whole
Posted: 2018-Jun-05 05:22
I would say that you can divide decks into several categories depending on what they do best. Here's in my opinion the 5 types of house cards you can have:
1) Strength pumping (ie Stannis, Balon, Ser Kevan)
2) House card manipulation (Tyrion, Roose, Patchface)
3) Board & game manipulation (QoT, Loras, Doran)
4) Kill cards (Viper, Eddard, Asha, Gregor)
5) Survive cards (any tower cards)

With that in mind, you can revisit and classify your decks.


Greyjoy - Strength pumping (main), card manipulation (weak)
This is clearly a strength pumping deck first and foremost, with conditional card manipulation from Aeron. As mentioned before, it's a deck that wins battles, and Aeron allows for faster resets and ensures some victories which would otherwise be a coin toss - if you have the power for it. Even though it has access to a potential of 5 swords in total, I would not classify this as a kill deck by any stretch of the imagination, 3 swords are conditional and hard to win with, and a certain one is on a 1 str character. The only sword you can reliably count on is Euron's. It's not really a survive deck either and has absolutely no board manipulation possibilities.
I would say it is a powerful deck, and easy to use in most circumstances.


Baratheon - Strength pumping (main), card manipulation (weak)
The Baratheon deck is a strength pumping deck similar to Greyjoy, you have 3 out of 7 cards that pump strength and are good (Stannis, Davor, Sala). You have a decent deck manipulation card in Patchface, and a really weak board manipulation card in Renly. It's actually a very similar deck to Greyjoy in that it can win battles by strength pumping and has some card manipulation leverage, it's just a slightly weaker version of the GJ deck in my opinion
and also slightly harder to use.


Stark - Kill and survival deck with card manipulation
Similar to GJ and Bara, Stark has no board and game manipulation cards (well there's Robb, but even he goes more into the potentially kill category than anything else). The deck excels at killing enemy units and saving its own. However, it has no strength pumping (except Cat which is ...) which means you'll have a hard time winning against either Bara and especially GJ with a full complement of cards. It's a resilient deck, but it's fairly one-dimensional and it relies completely on Roose. My least favorite deck.


Tyrell - Board manipulation (main), decent at survival
Tyrell is the king of board maniulation, with both QoT and Loras. Make no mistake, these are the cards that usually bring Tyrell victory, and it is because board manipulation can be devastating when done right. It has no strength pumping and no card manipulation, but it's decent at surviving and ok at inflicting casualties.


Martell - Board/game manipulation and kill deck
Martell is also very good at manipulating the game and board with Doran and Arianne, and it also has the ability to inflict casualties with 5 possible swords, 2 on their 4str card. No strength pumping or card manipulation for them, and mediocre to bad at survival. It is definitely a top notch deck though because of its two main characteristics.

Lannister - Jack of all trades
Lannister has a bit of everything. It has deck manipulation (Tyrion), game manipulation (Cersei, Tywin), strength pumping (Kevan), Kill cards (ser gregor) and survival cards (the hound). The fact that the deck is a jack of all trades master of none means that it is also harder to have a clear direction as other decks do. For example, Stark's strategy is pretty much set by its house cards - or at least the optimal way to play stark is already decided for you. With Lannister, it is hard to juggle all the cards with all the different effects and use them correctly. I would say I have most fun with the Lannister deck because it's not as straightforward as a Stark or Greyjoy deck to play. I struggle most with lanni on what cards to keep and play, how to reset my cards and all those minute details.
Nomaris
Maester without a chain

Posts: 2,454
Games: 389
Rank Points: 2,611
Member since: 2017-May-19

Topic: Ranking House Decks as a Whole
Posted: 2018-Jun-05 09:57
I totally agree with Zsas descriptions. Every Deck has a different flavour and it is difficult to say which deck is stronger without considering the circumstances (map position, number of players, etc.) So I will make a list of which decks I like the most:

1. Lannister
It is very versatile, but also quiet conditional. Not easy to play, but I like it very much.

2. Tyrell
Loras, QoT and a good mix of swords and towers on appropriate cards.

3. Martell
Doran, Arianne and the Viper are top cards. The others are less interesting and lacking useful towers.

4. Greyjoy
Balon and Victarion are great. Aeron can be useful as well. The others provide a nice mix of swords and towers.

5. Baratheon
I think this is the weakest deck, since it is very vulnerable to card bait, has only one tower and relatively weak sword cards. The strength boost of Stannis, Davos and Salla can be very handy and allows for some strategies. Patchface is really nice as well.

6. Stark
Although Stark is a pretty strong deck (Eddard, Roose and plenty of towers), I like it the least, since it is pretty one dimensional.


Ser Hodor
Son Of Hodor

Posts: 756
Games: 1,331
Rank Points: 10,054
Member since: 2016-Mar-20

Topic: Ranking House Decks as a Whole
Posted: 2018-Jun-07 08:25
I think Zsa's breakdown is rather succinct, but definitive.  And he teases out something I've been considering for a while.  Conventional wisdom holds that Greyjoy deck is the most overpowered, but I couldn't square that with Martell having the best 0, best 1, and best 4 card all in this same deck. And yet, the win rates (across the site and my own) did bear out that Greyjoy had the advantage.  But they also show that Stark has even better results, and no one seems to take that to mean their deck is best.

Zsa's categorical breakdown actually leads me to understand why Greyjoy is my least favorite house to play: their deck is actually next to Bara's for weakest in the game.  This is counterintuitive, because its strength is entirely concentrated in the most obvious, surface level, what Zsa refers to as strength-pumping. The bottom line is they win the battle at hand.  But , that is all they do. The deck is entirely one-dimensional, lacking any ability to enact change beyond the embattled area, or to force your opponent into anything they don't want to do (the way Tyrion, Pathface, Robb, QOT, Cersei, Arianne, and Doran do).  And with all their strength, the deck is the worst of the lot at inflicting actual casualties when it wins, while also being as bad as any at defending against casualties when they do lose.  

The only area in which it could be said to have unique strength is that, provided you have enough money to use him, Aeron makes it fairly pointless for your opponents to even try to bluff or bait you into playing high cards against weak ones.  Even that ability is kind of wasted, however, since when fighting Stark, Roose allows him to continually play his top card without worrying about not be able to get him back.

You could actually track two separate categories for baiting - ease of baiting and susceptibility to being baited.  Bara and Tyrell are particularly susceptible to being baited, since their highest strength cards don't present much of a threat when they win on defense (getting Tyrell to play Loras on defense is an unalloyed win in itself).  Lanni, Martell and to a lesser extent Stark exact more of a cost when you "successfully" draw out their top cards, not to mention Doran and Cersei's potentially crippling effects when you do wind up with a battle of 0-1 cards.  And Arianne's being a very safe bet to "gamble" on defense.

In terms of having cards to bait with, Stark and Tyrell have the best options (meaning forts on low cards).  Martell is pretty good too, because Doran takes his toll no matter the outcome, and losing to the Viper is potentially devastating compared to losing to Stannis/Victarion/Renly/Balon/Mace, so opponents have to play more scared.  A big part of why Bara and Greyjoy's decks are weakest is that their opponents can attack them with relative impunity, even without real hope of winning, in the idle hope that they will make an error.

Getting back to Greyjoy specifically, I've come to think that the reason for their dominance comes in spite of, rather than because of their deceptively weak cards. It's mainly a function of their excellent starting position, with the blade, an extra ship, and immediate access to rich, easily supportable strongholds without even having to forego early CP opportunity to get them.  Plus, the quirks of the thronemaster wildling system blunts the value of Lanni's messenger raven, widening that imbalance at the outset.  All of this is enough to compensate for Greyjoy's deck being designed specifically to lose the war while winning the battle.

Conversely, Martell has the best deck and the worst board position, stuck in a corner that they often can't break out of without giving the game to an already dominant Stark/Greyjoy/Lanni who they can't touch directly.  Martell might overtake Stark/Greyjoy on stats if games went to 11 or 12 turns, but I'm realizing the tough thing about them is that often times you get one shot per game to jump out to an advantage that can sustain you to victory.  And if you aren't ready to pounce on it, your hopes shrivel up as you limp to a 3rd place finish with the same 4 castles you've had the entire game.
Ser Hodor
Son Of Hodor

Posts: 756
Games: 1,331
Rank Points: 10,054
Member since: 2016-Mar-20

Topic: Ranking House Decks as a Whole
Posted: 2018-Jun-07 08:35
Roundabout way to saying that my rankings, based only on strength of the cards themselves, would go:

1. Martell - Doran and Viper are two of the most dangerous cards in the game, and even Arianne is gamebreaker in her lategame potential.

2. Tyrell - QOT and Loras can absolutely wreck house under the right circumstances, and even their worst card, Randyll, is pretty much exactly average.

3. Lannister - As Zsa points out, this deck has some of everything. It requires a deft hand to wield properly, but between Gregor, Cersei, and Tyrion they have several cards that can ruin an unwary enemy's entire game in a single battle.

4. Stark - There isn't a lot to this deck, but again as Zsa points out, it is effectively the best kill deck and the best survival deck at once.  In  expert hands, which includes many here, I'd put it behind Tyrell/Lanni for its inability to make big plays. But for a new or average player, it's probably up with Martell's in value. It's hard to misplay this one, but the ceiling on its potential is lower.

5. Greyjoy - As I went into above, this deck is overwhelmingly strong, so long as you judge it solely at how much effective combat strength the cards can produce.  But with their inability to produce any wider repercussions, kill enemies in victory or save units in defeat, it seems designed to peak early and wither in the later stages when the game is on the line.

6.  Bara - The one unique characteristic of Bara's deck, the thing it does better than any other house, is how it maintains strength as the hand develops.  Where most decks have exactly one 3 and one 4 strength card, Bara has four cards that routinely play for 3-5 effective combat strength.  Plus Patchface's deterrent effect remains just as strong when you have less (fewer) options to choose from, and Brienne is one of the better, if not sexier, 2 cards. So it starts weak, but doesn't get too much worse as it winnows down.  But ultimately, it has the same issues as Greyjoy. There's no bonus for when Super-Stannis smashes your opponents' defenses with 3 strength to spare.  You can win a lot of battles with these cards, but you damn well better.  Because you pretty much need to win all of them in order to gain any ground and actually hold on to it.
Jester
Blacksmith

Posts: 66
Games: 23
Rank Points: 160
Member since: 2018-Mar-03

Topic: Ranking House Decks as a Whole
Posted: 2019-Apr-12 11:14
5. Greyjoy - As I went into above, this deck is overwhelmingly strong, so long as you judge it solely at how much effective combat strength the cards can produce.  But with their inability to produce any wider repercussions, kill enemies in victory or save units in defeat, it seems designed to peak early and wither in the later stages when the game is on the line.

I think the philosophy behind Greyjoy is:
- getting resources FAST to outbid/outnumber next turn
- threatening use of Balon and Victarion for as long as possible

Tyrell can penetrate Greyjoy's seas much easier than vulnerable Lannister or thinned out Stark. Victarion doesn't look like as big of a threat against them... but other neighbours always have the nagging thought: "why should I even bother with taking IB if he's able to retreat and definitely counterattack successfully?". In my opinion this is a deterrent in itself.
Similarly with Balon - usable once per cycle, granted, but he's so powerful on defense, with Lanni & Stark usually mustering siege engines to even get a chance of penetrating Greyjoy's trenches.

I'm less experienced than many of you, so I can't disagree "strongly", but still, I see GJ's deck as second best, behind Martell, maybe ex aequo with roses.
Ser Hodor
Son Of Hodor

Posts: 756
Games: 1,331
Rank Points: 10,054
Member since: 2016-Mar-20

Topic: Ranking House Decks as a Whole
Posted: 2019-Apr-12 17:21
Stark and Greyjoy's strengths are such that beginners can realize them to close to their full potential.  Experts will cycle more efficiently, and in GJ's case manage selection well enough that they don't have to pay Aeron's toll as often.  But Tyrell and Lannister require a keen eye and deft hand to use properly.  In amateur hands, they will be stymied constantly and never get their feet under them at all.  But there is nothing in the game as beautiful as watching a true maestro play the Lanni deck such that every step his opponent gains puts him two steps back, or as terrifying as a Tyrell with a full deck, large army and strong track positions go on the warpath.
Jester
Blacksmith

Posts: 66
Games: 23
Rank Points: 160
Member since: 2018-Mar-03

Topic: Ranking House Decks as a Whole
Posted: 2019-Apr-13 01:45
Stark and Greyjoy's strengths are such that beginners can realize them to close to their full potential.  Experts will cycle more efficiently, and in GJ's case manage selection well enough that they don't have to pay Aeron's toll as often.  But Tyrell and Lannister require a keen eye and deft hand to use properly.  In amateur hands, they will be stymied constantly and never get their feet under them at all.  But there is nothing in the game as beautiful as watching a true maestro play the Lanni deck such that every step his opponent gains puts him two steps back, or as terrifying as a Tyrell with a full deck, large army and strong track positions go on the warpath.
Agreed, this is a thing of beauty and I spent more time watching Tyrell/Lanni/Martell play than GJ. But "ease of use" is definitely a part of winning formula as well. Maybe I'm partial at the moment because in most recent games I've played/seen Lannister was manhandled really BAD and it made GJ look even better than they are.
Ser Hodor
Son Of Hodor

Posts: 756
Games: 1,331
Rank Points: 10,054
Member since: 2016-Mar-20

Topic: Ranking House Decks as a Whole
Posted: 2019-Apr-13 04:32
There's also more that goes into the houses' relative performances than their cards.  Greyjoy and Stark fare well because their cards are strong and easy to use, yes, but also because they start with advantages - an extra ship, the blade or multiple stars (with no threat of Doran stealing them), either easy access to 4 strongholds or two kingdoms worth of space to expand/retreat into without impeding on another house's territory. If Tyrell had any of that going for them, I think their results would be drastically better.  And any other's prospects would dwindle if they had Greyjoy breathing down their neck and ready to knock on their capital's door after the first turn.
deranger
Squire

Posts: 121
Games: 55
Rank Points: 394
Member since: 2016-Mar-30

Topic: Ranking House Decks as a Whole
Posted: 2019-Apr-13 16:48
If Tyrell had any of that going for them, I think their results would be drastically better.  And any other's prospects would dwindle if they had Greyjoy breathing down their neck and ready to knock on their capital's door after the first turn.
Tyrell with a star has had pretty drastically improved results in MoD, consensus seems to be they're the strongest house in westeros with it. An extra enemy at Martell's and Bara's back to worry about probably doesn't hurt Tyrell either.
Duckfield
King's Councillor

Posts: 134
Games: 380
Rank Points: 2,588
Member since: 2016-Nov-24

Topic: Ranking House Decks as a Whole
Posted: 2019-Apr-16 20:16
A lot of great thoughts in here. One thing not quite explored is how the decks fair RELATIVE to their neighbors decks. This is quite important when ranking the decks, because while Stark may have a straightforward deck, it matters little that he lacks the utility of Tyrell since they will never encounter each other. To use the Starks as an example, you could make the case that hey have one of the strongest decks because, relative to their enemies, they are almost never taking a casualty while almost always inflicting them.
ajant
Blacksmith's Apprentice

Posts: 148
Games: 34
Rank Points: 88
Member since: 2014-May-31

Topic: Ranking House Decks as a Whole
Posted: 2019-Apr-16 21:46
I mentioned Stark as being better deck in random starting position games, then in standard. their great defensive power is significantly less useful when facing bara & gj, their usual enemies, who are houses with fewest swords, then they would be against other 3 houses. their offense cards are potent, but a huge part of their overall deck value, can't be utilized as easily. martel & tyrell decks on the other hand would be pretty good, no mater where they are placed, relative to other houses.

that's why track positions & map positions are needed to rectify that, which hey do pretty well. for instance, two strongest decks are handicapped. martel is boxed in, tyrell has no stars to start with and they are facing each other


Ser Hodor
Son Of Hodor

Posts: 756
Games: 1,331
Rank Points: 10,054
Member since: 2016-Mar-20

Topic: Ranking House Decks as a Whole
Posted: 2019-Apr-17 04:38
I’m guessing Tyrell fares even worse in most random start games, because their dismal track positions are even more of a hindrance if they start in one of the positions more susceptible to immediate attack. But, I would much rather have Stark for a neighbor than Lannister or Martell, who both have cards to counter Tyrell’s greatest weapon in Loras.
12

Please log in to use the reply function.
toast