Most users ever online was 263 on 2020-Apr-18 20:02
Users in total:
Newest user:
26 users online:
21,952
KresT_T
snufkin_1301 2 h 8 min ago

3pl live 1 more

snufkin_1301 2 h 13 min ago

+1 3pl live

D_jaja 2 h 21 min ago

2/3

snufkin_1301 2 h 35 min ago

+1 3pl live

D_jaja 2 h 58 min ago

3p live up

Mofi 4 hours ago

Yes. Me too.

El Grande 4 hours ago

Since yesterday, everytime I enter the website I am being locked out automatically. Anyone else having this issue?

vyacheslav 5 hours ago

how many players?

snufkin_1301 5 hours ago

could anybody create live game?

sleep_sheep3 7 hours ago

me

gggg 7 hours ago

need 1 person

gggg 7 hours ago

2/3

gggg 7 hours ago

looking for a game

Les sept couronnes 7 hours ago

2/3

Lord Crook 9 hours ago

3 live up

Les sept couronnes 11 hours ago

New game please

Les sept couronnes 11 hours ago

2/3

sydneygas 11 hours ago

one more to battle

sydneygas 11 hours ago

another quick 3p before bed?

PawcioF 11 hours ago

done

You will suffer... muhahaaa!



Community Forum
Search |  


Author
Message
Ben
Blacksmith

Posts: 7
Games: 41
Rank Points: 159
Member since: 2014-Feb-05

Topic: Supply/march question
Posted: 2019-Oct-28 22:49
Hi all, in a PBEM game I am maxed out at 3/2/2 on supply. I currently have 3 knights in KL and 1 in the Reach and want to attack into BW from KL. Ideally, I would like to send 1 knight to BW, 1 to the Reach and leave 1 in KL. This would, if/when I win the battle, leave with me 2 units in the Reach, 1 in KL, 1 in BW, still satisfying supply limits (at 2/2/2 out of my available 3/2/2). However, I can't seem to execute these orders on my march.  Am I doing something incorrectly or is it right that I should not be able to march this way?


I understand that if I were to lose the battle, I would not be able to retreat the defeated knight back to KL without exceeding supply limits, since that would otherwise put me at 2/2/2/2. I would think if that did occur I would have to destroy the defeated knight that went into the battle. In this case, it is not possible for me to lose the battle so it's not a concern for me but otherwise I see how that's a risk.

Thanks in advance for the help.
Harakon
Grandmaester of Reports

Posts: 3,634
Games: 903
Rank Points: 3,430
Member since: 2014-Aug-24

Topic: Supply/march question
Posted: 2019-Oct-28 22:56
Can you give us the game Id or link? Like this it would be easier to actually answer you this


Necrarch
Knight of Ni

Posts: 2,044
Games: 135
Rank Points: 1,003
Member since: 2019-Feb-01

Topic: Supply/march question
Posted: 2019-Oct-29 00:10
As far as I remember, the rule is that supply limits must be acceptable at every moment of the game, and the use here is that all bits-of-marches must be dealt with that constraint, knowing that the one that generates the fight must be dealt with last.

In your case, you simply can't send the knight to Reach because that one must be done before you send your knight to BW.

If BW was empty, you would be able to do that because you would be able to do your sub-march to BW before doing the one to the Reach, but here the "fight-is-last" part prevents that.

However, I am not sure if on that point Thronemaster differs from the official rule and it's an implementation question, or if the rule is the exact one applied here. I remember that something like that is in a FAQ, please have a look.


ElPopelos
Keeper of the Forbidden Wilds

Posts: 3,874
Games: 179
Rank Points: 1,271
Member since: 2013-Feb-01

Topic: Supply/march question
Posted: 2019-Oct-29 01:31
As Necrarch said, theoretically you could lose the battle or would be forced to retreat due to some Housecards. And in that case you would exceed your Supply-limit.

Therefore, even if its practically impossible for you to lose you cant make that move.


Ben
Blacksmith

Posts: 7
Games: 41
Rank Points: 159
Member since: 2014-Feb-05

Topic: Supply/march question
Posted: 2019-Oct-29 17:28
Got it, thanks everyone.

Please log in to use the reply function.
toast