A while back the following situation occured, and I am wondering if anyone can confirm if it is a correct implementation of the rules ?
Martell defends Sunspear with the garrison and there are ships in port.
Martell plays Arianne and loose the battle.
The garrison is destroyed and Sunspear remains Martell territory but the ships in port are not destroyed - is this correct ?
As the attacker I was expecting the ships to be destroyed, because I compared it to the situation where Arianne defends and loose a territory with a power token in it. The token in this case is removed.
Hence loosing the battle has an effect on the territory, even though the attacker is denied the territory.
Martell defends Sunspear with the garrison and there are ships in port.
Martell plays Arianne and loose the battle.
The garrison is destroyed and Sunspear remains Martell territory but the ships in port are not destroyed - is this correct ?
As the attacker I was expecting the ships to be destroyed, because I compared it to the situation where Arianne defends and loose a territory with a power token in it. The token in this case is removed.
Hence loosing the battle has an effect on the territory, even though the attacker is denied the territory.
