That game 3890 is a horrible example. baratheon could have stopped the  win but let stark take kings landing by placing poor orders.

That game 3890 is a horrible example. baratheon could have stopped the  win but let stark take kings landing by placing poor orders. Stark could have taken Harrenhal as well, so thwarting his victory would have been a team effort.

I believe that no matter what you don't let a player to win..If during the last round two players are able to win , you have to do everything to stop them from winning eventhough someone was your ally and loose the game..Otherwise it is unfair for the other..

This proves my point. As a moderator politely pointed out, you (Lanni) destroyed Greyjoy, and you seriously expect him to do you a favour by stopping Starks so that you can win?

AGOT is very much a game of diplomacy.

Here is another example for kingmaking ID 3890

Greyjoy was able to stop stark from winning the game by attacking moat cailin by using balon. but instead he chose to do nothing because the game was not working well for him. All other players are are away from winning, so it would had make a difference if he stopped him.

I wrote him a message by telling him that he could stop him but he ignored it. The fact that makes this example more ironic is, that the game is called "NO KINGMAKERS/ALLIANCES 01"