Most users ever online was 263 on 2020-Apr-18 20:02
Users in total:
Newest user:
13 users online:
19,538
donjonson69
Soda-can 9 hours ago

3pup

JaqenHghar0 9 hours ago

3p live someone?

Soda-can 9 hours ago

pith wwhydo leave midday?

Soda-can 10 hours ago

Yoo crock an gorgan ICS come back??

Soda-can 10 hours ago

6P live 3/6 Three more !

Soda-can 10 hours ago

6P live 2/6

Soda-can 13 hours ago

3pup

heyjakel 15 hours ago

3p pbem up

gost 15 hours ago

Host a 3p PBEM please

Soda-can 22 hours ago

3pup

Lord Crook 32 hours ago

2/3

Themanhasnoname 32 hours ago

snufkin were art thou?

snufkin_1301 33 hours ago

join 3pl live

Lord Crook 35 hours ago

3 live up

eilon53 37 hours ago

2/3 live

eilon53 37 hours ago

3P Live up

D_jaja 39 hours ago

3rd player, who are u? GREEN up pls

JaqenHghar0 53 hours ago

3p live someone?

Soda-can 54 hours ago

2/3

Soda-can 59 hours ago

2/3

I could be your quote. ;)



Community Forum
Search |  


Author
Message
Wallygator7070
Blacksmith's Apprentice

Posts: 9
Games: 25
Rank Points: 102
Member since: 2022-Jul-29

Topic: Teamplay 3v3 or 2v2v2 for balancing
Posted: 2022-Sep-28 09:57
Hi all,

Kinda new here, so pardon me if this has been already discussed (I did my search though).

Since, all house have their strength and weaknesess maybe it would be good idea for balancing game for competitive purposes by Introducing Team Mode.

Core ideas:
1. Team wins when one of the house in the Team gets 7th castle/fortress
2. Team members cannot be directly adjacent to each other - orherwise it would be race for vacating the castles for your Team mate.
3. Natural teams would be then:
   a. Team 1: Stark, Lanni, Martell
   b. Team 2: Greyjoy, Tyrell, Baratheon

Key questions:
1. Would this be viable in generally?
2. What other rules and restrictions should apply?
3. Team 1 would have obvious advantage in stars/special orders, Team 2 would have battle advantage - would these be balanced by other factors or still any of teams would be imba?
4. Are any other team compositions viable?

Any thoughts appreciated.
Necrarch
Knight of Ni

Posts: 2,294
Games: 142
Rank Points: 1,047
Member since: 2019-Feb-01

Topic: Teamplay 3v3 or 2v2v2 for balancing
Posted: 2022-Sep-28 10:53
Last time I saw this done, it was
- Win with Sum of castles instead of 7 for one person (avoid a win by giving castles)
- Adjacent teams, because unless there will be sandwiches (Lanni between G/T/B is dead turn 3 in your setup).

Was West vs East : Grey / Lanni / Tyrell VS Stark / Bara / Martell.


Strongest_Gallic
King's Councillor

Posts: 595
Games: 410
Rank Points: 3,262
Member since: 2015-Jun-01

Topic: Teamplay 3v3 or 2v2v2 for balancing
Posted: 2022-Sep-28 13:27
https://www.thronemaster.net/?goto=community&sub=forum&fid=2&tid=24807#top

That's how it was done in the old days. There's a whole discussion there to take ideas from. The first post lists the final rules.


Ser Hodor
Son Of Hodor

Posts: 758
Games: 1,358
Rank Points: 10,286
Member since: 2016-Mar-20

Topic: Teamplay 3v3 or 2v2v2 for balancing
Posted: 2022-Sep-28 22:11
Last time I saw this done, it was
- Win with Sum of castles instead of 7 for one person (avoid a win by giving castles)
- Adjacent teams, because unless there will be sandwiches (Lanni between G/T/B is dead turn 3 in your setup).

Was West vs East : Grey / Lanni / Tyrell VS Stark / Bara / Martell.

Curious how this works out, because my first thought is that by avoding sandwiches you also make it completely impossible for anyone to take a sea territory (other than Bay Of Ice).  Without that, entire dynamic is changed to an overland grind. And seems to favor the West side considerably. They have extra, non-capital Strongholds (Riverrun + Oldtown + Seagard vs King's Landing in the east) plus the only sea access to enemy territories (i.e. Winterfell and Starfall).

I wonder if switching the allegiance of the southerners (Stark/Bara/Tyrell vs Greyjoy/Lanni/Martell) would yield a better balance?

Please log in to use the reply function.
toast