Koringhus 52 minutes ago

Could anyone make live 6p? I would like to join

Daredevil Z 1 h 45 min ago

3p fast+++

laosiji 2 h 1 min ago

live

eilon53 6 hours ago

2/3 live

logos 6 hours ago

2/3

logos 6 hours ago

1/3

sydneygas 6 hours ago

one more needed for war

Daredevil Z 10 hours ago

3p fast, welcome

Nicky 10 hours ago

Anyone 3p live?

travis23 13 hours ago

3p live, welcome

CKyou2 23 hours ago

1/3

CKyou2 23 hours ago

Live 3p fast creates

laosiji 23 hours ago

4/6

D_jaja 24 hours ago

6p live up

holtaf 24 hours ago

2/3

Les sept couronnes 25 hours ago

2/3 live 1more player

Les sept couronnes 25 hours ago

1/3 live join please

Les sept couronnes 25 hours ago

Thanks

holtaf 25 hours ago

Les sept couronnes, created

Les sept couronnes 25 hours ago

New live please

I could be your quote. ;)



Community Forum
Search |  


Author
Message
justinlevy010
Warden Of The North

Posts: 41
Games: 366
Rank Points: 2,085
Member since: 2014-Oct-18

Topic: Lannister attacking GJ... what???....
Posted: 2017-Mar-15 19:07
OK so a lot has been written about the GJ/Lannister fight versus alliance and I didn't think I could add anything to the thousands of pages dissecting every nuance of that complicated relationship, however...

Usually if I play as lannister my first move is send a message to GJ asking for an alliance.  However, I've noticed that if there is an inexperienced GJ, that may not be the best option.   Or if I do ally up, backstabbing within a couple rounds is ideal.   I've seen so many inexperienced GJ's make bad moves in the beginning of the game-- using Balon in the first battle, putting a CP on pyke in turn 1, letting me take RR in turn 1 and moving ship out of ironman's bay and into sunset, etc...

In short, I feel like having an inexperienced GJ player narrows the GJ/lannister imbalance enough that I don't necessarily feel the need to ally up at the beginning.  If i can get stark/tyrell on my side (which I usually can) I can usually get the upper hand
ElPopelos
Keeper of the Forbidden Wilds

Posts: 3,874
Games: 179
Rank Points: 1,271
Member since: 2013-Feb-01

Topic: Lannister attacking GJ... what???....
Posted: 2017-Mar-15 19:55
Hi Levin,
so you arebasically saying that an experienced player can defeat an unexperienced player?
So whats the innovative thing, you are trying to say? :-P


rangercardoso
One Of The Kingsguard

Posts: 118
Games: 124
Rank Points: 826
Member since: 2013-Dec-16

Topic: Lannister attacking GJ... what???....
Posted: 2017-Mar-15 20:32
ehehe
justinlevy010
Warden Of The North

Posts: 41
Games: 366
Rank Points: 2,085
Member since: 2014-Oct-18

Topic: Lannister attacking GJ... what???....
Posted: 2017-Mar-15 22:12
well elpopelos... of course in the abstract I am saying that an experienced player can defeat an inexperienced player which is nothing new.

What is new (at least I haven't seen anyone talk about it) is applying that concept specifically to the Lanni/GJ dynamic.

Maybe there is nothing new or innovative.  Just wanted to throw it out there.  Sorry I had to waste a minute and a half of your life with it!
ElPopelos
Keeper of the Forbidden Wilds

Posts: 3,874
Games: 179
Rank Points: 1,271
Member since: 2013-Feb-01

Topic: Lannister attacking GJ... what???....
Posted: 2017-Mar-15 22:25


Maybe there is nothing new or innovative.  Just wanted to throw it out there.  Sorry I had to waste a minute and a half of your life with it!

Hey mate, i was just kidding.
The nice thing about this game is, that its so complex that there isnt THE correct way to go.
What i was heading for was the suggetion to postz your opinio into one of the ongoing discussions insad of opening a new Thread for it, making the whole discussionthinga bit more complex.


justinlevy010
Warden Of The North

Posts: 41
Games: 366
Rank Points: 2,085
Member since: 2014-Oct-18

Topic: Lannister attacking GJ... what???....
Posted: 2017-Mar-15 22:35
ahh... didn't realize that was where you were heading... thought you were just being a dick!  
I'll remember that for next time
Strongest_Gallic
King's Councillor

Posts: 586
Games: 382
Rank Points: 3,001
Member since: 2015-Jun-01

Topic: Lannister attacking GJ... what???....
Posted: 2017-Mar-16 00:25
Even with experienced players I don't see the problem in fighting GJ. With the right moves and the right Westeros... You might need a little luck and a little diplomacy, there's no room for any mistake, but it's more than doable. I don't see the fuss about the gj advantage, except with weak players.

Every gj that tried to beat me until now agreed to an alliance after some rounds not getting anywhere, and the one time I was beating gj hard, I made 1 mistake and it was over for me. Gj has more room for mistakes, but the forces are more or less equal if you ask me, depending on the opening...

Only problem is that 2 good players will probably keep each other balanced, not taking ground, while the other houses close in on you and vulture on your losses... So in the end you end up allying anyway. Which you should have done from the start.

But good to know you'd backstab me after a couple of rounds, I'll keep it in mind
I also disagree that the lanni-backstab is imperative, but yes let's discuss that on another forum.

@ElPopelos: I agree with RangerCardoso it was funny...
☠ Dele✝ed User

One disappeared.
One came back from the dead.

Topic: Lannister attacking GJ... what???....
Posted: 2017-Mar-19 04:06
In my humble opinion, GJ/Lanni-alliances are most difficult to defend, whereat a lot of mustering during first to fifth round certainly enhances GJ's odds to gain a favourable position in order to win the game. Nevertheless, justinlevy010 gives the perfect example of what, in particular, the Ladies and Lords of Winterfell have to wait for. If GJ exposes him/erself in the North way too early and allows Lanni to pile up as s/he likes, GJ is doomed, especially if Bara is occupied with Martell/Tyrell rather than interfering in western matters, and unless Lanni has a change of heart and surprisingly sticks to the agreement. Nothing new so far, I presume (the same is valid in case that more experienced players are distressing recognisable newbies immediately, or let them play on their bidding, or whatever you had in mind, jl010).

What could be a game-changer for the board game's - as well as for our forum's 3rd edition map regarding the rather northern system of balance, instead of arguing about rather obvious - let's say - diplomatic options, is upranking Bear Island as a buffer zone (poor as it is, without a barrel or a crown) between Winterfell and BoI and giving Lanni one more barrel or crown or stronghold (Casterly Rock as an additional territory perhaps) in the area.

A lightweight opinion, of course, but this refinement could give the casual RR-bleeding (favouring, most likely, Stark or even Tyrell or Bara) as well as an only one-side (depending on Westeros phases like Strongest_Gallic implied) privileging (later triggered) backstab-operation an option to recover instead of making one or another party gain a cheap win due to failed GJ/Lanni ambitions or, likewise, mistakes.
Bruce Mooton
Blacksmith's Apprentice

Posts: 21
Games: 23
Rank Points: 125
Member since: 2016-Jun-28

Topic: Lannister attacking GJ... what???....
Posted: 2017-Apr-13 02:31
Oooh, goody! I've been looking for a place to throw a new idea out about the GJ/Lanni alliance...
Lanni should get GJ alliance if possible - but always betray this alliance at some point. Now, that's not a novel suggestion.

What is new is this; if you search games where Lanni wins, in almost all of them, it is because he takes GJ's castles. I would wager it is well over 90% of them. This doesn't seem true of any other house; they all seem to have multiple paths to victory (e.g. Stark can win by beating a. GJ b. Bara or c. parts of GJ and Bara). Lanni only has one path to victory and it's pretty narrow; one misstep and GJ's got you.

So yeah. Data seems to say survive first few rounds against GJ however possible, and then betray when time is right.
Thooooough I can't say I've been able to leverage this insight into any Lanni wins haha


☠ Dele✝ed User

One disappeared.
One came back from the dead.

Topic: Lannister attacking GJ... what???....
Posted: 2017-Apr-16 01:42
Pointing from the current adaption of the 2nd edition's map, Bruce_M, every thought brought up here and yours, of course, is kind of having a merit. Two of six neighbouring parties always could make a stalemate deal about some territory of interest favouring the faster or more clever or more vicious player in order to gain seven castles in the end.
My suggestion would be to refine the map (in terms of dividing Lannisport into Casterly Rock/stronghold and Lannisport/two barrels) in order to make at least the Stark(+Bear Island)/Lanni/GJ balance more attractive to fight about rather than make one alliance (GJ/Stark or GJ/Lanni or GJ/Bara) gain a cheap win or make a vulturing Bara/Tyrell win just as likely.
☠ Dele✝ed User

One disappeared.
One came back from the dead.

Topic: Lannister attacking GJ... what???....
Posted: 2018-Mar-24 01:27
A perfect example to support the suggestion from 2017-Mar-19 04:06 but with GJ exhausting his/her ressources way too early on Stark's behalf:

https://game.thronemaster.net/?review=1&game=155703

Greyjoy can't outsmart Stark under these circumstances.
Zsa
Knight

Posts: 83
Games: 79
Rank Points: 685
Member since: 2017-Sep-01

Topic: Lannister attacking GJ... what???....
Posted: 2018-Mar-26 18:56
I hope we can all agree that GJ won't have a an easy life if he decides to fight Lanni and does not win decisively in the first few rounds (which can only happen if Lanni is bad). If you add a Bara/Stark alliance to that, then that's curtains for GJ .

This seems a bit like beating a dead horse, especially since most posts are a year old, but... I'd like to voice my disagreement with regards to Strongest_Gallic's claims of parity between GJ and Lannister.

Please log in to use the reply function.
toast