Most users ever online was 263 on 2020-Apr-18 20:02
Users in total:
Newest user:
17 users online:
20,542
Pawcio
aglio olio 6 hours ago

1 more

fedda 6 hours ago

1 morer

Tiguera 6 hours ago

2/3

Tiguera 6 hours ago

3p live up

sebaleto 12 hours ago

3p live up

OberynM523 17 hours ago

2/3

OberynM523 17 hours ago

3P Fast+

MaesterOppenheim 26 hours ago

2/3 live

GIANZAPPARIA 29 hours ago

What is the symbol on the right side of Aborted when I click on My Games?

Lord Crook 30 hours ago

2/3 live

D_jaja 30 hours ago

2/3

Lord Crook 31 hours ago

2/3

sebaleto 34 hours ago

2/3 live. join us

got_pocak 35 hours ago

One more Player? Live game

got_pocak 36 hours ago

Hi. Michaela, where are you?

michaela01 36 hours ago

Hi, please open 3p live , name Dragon

Lord Crook 51 hours ago

2/3

Lord Crook 52 hours ago

3 live up

Arek_AKA 3 days ago

Fast live 3p game

Arek_AKA 3 days ago

2/3 live

I AM YOUR FATHER!



Community Forum
Search |  


Author
Message
Wallygator7070
Blacksmith's Apprentice

Posts: 9
Games: 25
Rank Points: 102
Member since: 2022-Jul-29

Topic: Teamplay 3v3 or 2v2v2 for balancing
Posted: 2022-Sep-28 09:57
Hi all,

Kinda new here, so pardon me if this has been already discussed (I did my search though).

Since, all house have their strength and weaknesess maybe it would be good idea for balancing game for competitive purposes by Introducing Team Mode.

Core ideas:
1. Team wins when one of the house in the Team gets 7th castle/fortress
2. Team members cannot be directly adjacent to each other - orherwise it would be race for vacating the castles for your Team mate.
3. Natural teams would be then:
   a. Team 1: Stark, Lanni, Martell
   b. Team 2: Greyjoy, Tyrell, Baratheon

Key questions:
1. Would this be viable in generally?
2. What other rules and restrictions should apply?
3. Team 1 would have obvious advantage in stars/special orders, Team 2 would have battle advantage - would these be balanced by other factors or still any of teams would be imba?
4. Are any other team compositions viable?

Any thoughts appreciated.
Necrarch
Knight of Ni

Posts: 2,195
Games: 141
Rank Points: 1,043
Member since: 2019-Feb-01

Topic: Teamplay 3v3 or 2v2v2 for balancing
Posted: 2022-Sep-28 10:53
Last time I saw this done, it was
- Win with Sum of castles instead of 7 for one person (avoid a win by giving castles)
- Adjacent teams, because unless there will be sandwiches (Lanni between G/T/B is dead turn 3 in your setup).

Was West vs East : Grey / Lanni / Tyrell VS Stark / Bara / Martell.


Strongest_Gallic
King's Councillor

Posts: 590
Games: 405
Rank Points: 3,209
Member since: 2015-Jun-01

Topic: Teamplay 3v3 or 2v2v2 for balancing
Posted: 2022-Sep-28 13:27
https://www.thronemaster.net/?goto=community&sub=forum&fid=2&tid=24807#top

That's how it was done in the old days. There's a whole discussion there to take ideas from. The first post lists the final rules.


Ser Hodor
Son Of Hodor

Posts: 758
Games: 1,358
Rank Points: 10,286
Member since: 2016-Mar-20

Topic: Teamplay 3v3 or 2v2v2 for balancing
Posted: 2022-Sep-28 22:11
Last time I saw this done, it was
- Win with Sum of castles instead of 7 for one person (avoid a win by giving castles)
- Adjacent teams, because unless there will be sandwiches (Lanni between G/T/B is dead turn 3 in your setup).

Was West vs East : Grey / Lanni / Tyrell VS Stark / Bara / Martell.

Curious how this works out, because my first thought is that by avoding sandwiches you also make it completely impossible for anyone to take a sea territory (other than Bay Of Ice).  Without that, entire dynamic is changed to an overland grind. And seems to favor the West side considerably. They have extra, non-capital Strongholds (Riverrun + Oldtown + Seagard vs King's Landing in the east) plus the only sea access to enemy territories (i.e. Winterfell and Starfall).

I wonder if switching the allegiance of the southerners (Stark/Bara/Tyrell vs Greyjoy/Lanni/Martell) would yield a better balance?

Please log in to use the reply function.
toast