Most users ever online was 263 on 2020-Apr-18 20:02
Users in total:
Newest user:
26 users online:
21,584
SansaSnark
smnmslh 10 minutes ago

2/3

twst 15 minutes ago

retuning player - s1 down for a 6p?

smnmslh 37 minutes ago

3p live up

Chocolny 50 minutes ago

3p live 2/3

Chocolny 1 h 16 min ago

any 3p live?

Soda-can 4 hours ago

4/6 live

sydneygas 5 hours ago

3p live is up

dybrom 8 hours ago

any 3p live?

Siegfried98 10 hours ago

Live game including beginners

Soda-can 18 hours ago

Anyone for a win or u die live game?

smnmslh 19 hours ago

3p live up

CarfRevagen 19 hours ago

i am in ty

konrad98ft 19 hours ago

I just created sth

CarfRevagen 20 hours ago

any 3p live ranked?

LamieJannister 21 hours ago

Where do one ask to reopen an aborted game ?

smnmslh 21 hours ago

2/3

smnmslh 21 hours ago

3p quick

mmsaraiva 22 hours ago

Live game unrated created

scherdin 23 hours ago

Live rated 3 pl up!

Chocolny 24 hours ago

any 3p live game?

Any news?



Community Forum
Search |  


Author
Message
Wallygator7070
Blacksmith's Apprentice

Posts: 9
Games: 25
Rank Points: 102
Member since: 2022-Jul-29

Topic: Teamplay 3v3 or 2v2v2 for balancing
Posted: 2022-Sep-28 09:57
Hi all,

Kinda new here, so pardon me if this has been already discussed (I did my search though).

Since, all house have their strength and weaknesess maybe it would be good idea for balancing game for competitive purposes by Introducing Team Mode.

Core ideas:
1. Team wins when one of the house in the Team gets 7th castle/fortress
2. Team members cannot be directly adjacent to each other - orherwise it would be race for vacating the castles for your Team mate.
3. Natural teams would be then:
   a. Team 1: Stark, Lanni, Martell
   b. Team 2: Greyjoy, Tyrell, Baratheon

Key questions:
1. Would this be viable in generally?
2. What other rules and restrictions should apply?
3. Team 1 would have obvious advantage in stars/special orders, Team 2 would have battle advantage - would these be balanced by other factors or still any of teams would be imba?
4. Are any other team compositions viable?

Any thoughts appreciated.
Necrarch
Knight of Ni

Posts: 2,066
Games: 135
Rank Points: 1,003
Member since: 2019-Feb-01

Topic: Teamplay 3v3 or 2v2v2 for balancing
Posted: 2022-Sep-28 10:53
Last time I saw this done, it was
- Win with Sum of castles instead of 7 for one person (avoid a win by giving castles)
- Adjacent teams, because unless there will be sandwiches (Lanni between G/T/B is dead turn 3 in your setup).

Was West vs East : Grey / Lanni / Tyrell VS Stark / Bara / Martell.


Strongest_Gallic
King's Councillor

Posts: 586
Games: 384
Rank Points: 3,006
Member since: 2015-Jun-01

Topic: Teamplay 3v3 or 2v2v2 for balancing
Posted: 2022-Sep-28 13:27
https://www.thronemaster.net/?goto=community&sub=forum&fid=2&tid=24807#top

That's how it was done in the old days. There's a whole discussion there to take ideas from. The first post lists the final rules.


Ser Hodor
Son Of Hodor

Posts: 756
Games: 1,331
Rank Points: 10,054
Member since: 2016-Mar-20

Topic: Teamplay 3v3 or 2v2v2 for balancing
Posted: 2022-Sep-28 22:11
Last time I saw this done, it was
- Win with Sum of castles instead of 7 for one person (avoid a win by giving castles)
- Adjacent teams, because unless there will be sandwiches (Lanni between G/T/B is dead turn 3 in your setup).

Was West vs East : Grey / Lanni / Tyrell VS Stark / Bara / Martell.

Curious how this works out, because my first thought is that by avoding sandwiches you also make it completely impossible for anyone to take a sea territory (other than Bay Of Ice).  Without that, entire dynamic is changed to an overland grind. And seems to favor the West side considerably. They have extra, non-capital Strongholds (Riverrun + Oldtown + Seagard vs King's Landing in the east) plus the only sea access to enemy territories (i.e. Winterfell and Starfall).

I wonder if switching the allegiance of the southerners (Stark/Bara/Tyrell vs Greyjoy/Lanni/Martell) would yield a better balance?

Please log in to use the reply function.
toast