Daredevil Z 1 h 36 min ago

2/3

Daredevil Z 2 h 16 min ago

2/3

Mad King 2 h 50 min ago

cant see the game unfortunatly

omriex7 3 hours ago

6p live come join

Mad King 3 hours ago

anyone up for a 6p live fast?

omriex7 4 hours ago

3p live 2/3

eilon53 6 hours ago

2/3 live

travis23 8 hours ago

3p live's up

Daredevil Z 9 hours ago

3p fast, welcome

First Sword of Braavos 10 hours ago

2/3

First Sword of Braavos 10 hours ago

Sad this game is less popular these days

Kamil14 13 hours ago

If they don't controll any castles/strongholds and have units, then they still participate in bidding

Kamil14 13 hours ago

They are in the game as long as they have at least one land unit.

The Sphinx 14 hours ago

If a player possess 0 castles or strongholds and a clash comes, are they able to bid the tracks?

Sean_Snow 14 hours ago

And that's how Dusteppe became a turncoat

Sean_Snow 14 hours ago

And rhapsody how Dusteppe became a turncoat

Sean_Snow 14 hours ago

And rhapsody how Dusteppe became a turncoat

holtaf 15 hours ago

There's no way to cancel if you had pressed proceed

dusteppe 16 hours ago

Is it possible to cancel an attack after clicking proceed? I clicked the wrong region by accident

zbh711 16 hours ago

2/3

Go ahead, make my day.



Community Forum
Search |  


Author
Message
Danno
Blacksmith's Apprentice

Posts: 2
Games: 44
Rank Points: 105
Member since: 2014-Oct-08

Topic: Mace vs. Blackfish
Posted: 2015-Jun-04 20:05
Just had this come up in a game....Should Mace Tyrell's "immediately" kill a footman card power get prevented by the Blackfish's power to prevent all casualties?

The game resolved the interaction by killing the Stark footman...is this intended?
Bruno Rivers
Raventree Hall's Retainer

Posts: 489
Games: 183
Rank Points: 1,041
Member since: 2014-Mar-30

Topic: Mace vs. Blackfish
Posted: 2015-Jun-04 20:42
I think blackfish prevents the loss, because mace "ability" is prevented by the card, as it is said.

The FFG errata doesn't say anything. Maybe bacause it's not a commom issue.

Anyone disagrees?


CobisTaba
One Of The Kingsguard

Posts: 1,228
Games: 206
Rank Points: 975
Member since: 2013-Dec-23

Topic: Mace vs. Blackfish
Posted: 2015-Jun-04 20:56
If you want a fun discussion, look here

https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/813756/2-questions-mace-tyrell-vs-blackfish-and-doran-mar

No conclusion, but my opinion fits that Blackfish should be treated first and thus cancels the kill. Not 100% sure, but seems to fit how cards generally work.
Bruno Rivers
Raventree Hall's Retainer

Posts: 489
Games: 183
Rank Points: 1,041
Member since: 2014-Mar-30

Topic: Mace vs. Blackfish
Posted: 2015-Jun-04 21:01
Ahha. Already read that.


derBleede
Master Blacksmith

Posts: 377
Games: 115
Rank Points: 246
Member since: 2014-Mar-24

Topic: Mace vs. Blackfish
Posted: 2015-Jun-04 21:56
"You do not take casualities in his battle from house card abilities [...]"
chubako
King's Councillor

Posts: 473
Games: 426
Rank Points: 2,936
Member since: 2014-Oct-22

Topic: Mace vs. Blackfish
Posted: 2015-Jun-04 22:11
Well, in my group of friends, we always explain this rule this way:

Mace tyrell is the only card that has an ability which kills a unit
Blackfish's card ability can't be clearer that Stark takes no casualty from house card ability.
Therefore, if Mace Tyrell could kill a Stark footman thanks to his ability, a portion of the Blackfish would mean nothing, and FFG rules are never there for nothing.
Hence the Blackfish stops Mace tyrell's ability.

Also, one could argue that Mace ability is time dependant (dependant on track order to resolve conflict) as the Blackfish ability is absolute as long as the card is in play. Once again, the blackish still protects from Mace.

In conclusion, the blackfish should protect stark's footman from Mace.
El_Diablo
Squire

Posts: 2,175
Games: 81
Rank Points: 480
Member since: 2011-Nov-08

Topic: Mace vs. Blackfish
Posted: 2015-Jun-04 22:26
Mace tyrell is the only card that has an ability which kills a unit
Blackfish's card ability can't be clearer that Stark takes no casualty from house card ability.
Therefore, if Mace Tyrell could kill a Stark footman thanks to his ability, a portion of the Blackfish would mean nothing, and FFG rules are never there for nothing.
Hence the Blackfish stops Mace tyrell's ability.

I follow that argument. Sounds logic.


ordo909
Blacksmith

Posts: 11
Games: 91
Rank Points: 155
Member since: 2015-Apr-03

Topic: Mace vs. Blackfish
Posted: 2015-Jun-05 04:18
I have always played that Blackfish would cancel Mace. It specifically states "You do not take casualties in this combat from house card abilities...." It couldn't be any more clear than that.
JM Grip
The 8th God

Posts: 5,236
Games: 92
Rank Points: 686
Member since: 2007-Sep-28

Topic: Mace vs. Blackfish
Posted: 2015-Jun-05 08:04
Looks like I should add this case to the implementation of the game...


Nezrael
Battle Commander

Posts: 56
Games: 252
Rank Points: 1,546
Member since: 2013-Jan-08

Topic: Mace vs. Blackfish
Posted: 2015-Jun-05 10:36
You could argue about the definition of casualties here, as they are generally only calculated at the end of combat, and just occur for the losing player.
Mace's ability however is resolved before the outcome of a battle is determined and affects the oponent even if he eventuelly wins anyway.

Therefore, if Mace Tyrell could kill a Stark footman thanks to his ability, a portion of the Blackfish would mean nothing, and FFG rules are never there for nothing. The wording also could have been chosen to be as clear as possible for possible interactions with Cards from upcoming expansions, so I wouldn't neccessarily call it "there for nothing".

That said, I find this way of interpreting the situation comprehensible, but pretty nitpicky and unintuitive, so I would probably have the Blackfish save that footman.


Harakon
Grandmaester of Reports

Posts: 3,634
Games: 903
Rank Points: 3,430
Member since: 2014-Aug-24

Topic: Mace vs. Blackfish
Posted: 2015-Jun-05 11:59
Well if Blakfish would not counter Mace, then why not give the Blackfish 3 Towericons. The most swords on a card are on Gregor Clegane and then you "to not take casualties in this combat".
It is very specific about "Housecard" abilties.

The "exact" wording in german(translated): You dont loose units in this battle through housecard abilities, swordicons or tide of battle.
You dont loose units in this fight, end of story.


JM Grip
The 8th God

Posts: 5,236
Games: 92
Rank Points: 686
Member since: 2007-Sep-28

Topic: Mace vs. Blackfish
Posted: 2015-Jun-05 12:10
You dont loose units in this fight, end of story.
Except by supply while retreating...


Nezrael
Battle Commander

Posts: 56
Games: 252
Rank Points: 1,546
Member since: 2013-Jan-08

Topic: Mace vs. Blackfish
Posted: 2015-Jun-05 12:17
You dont loose units in this fight, end of story.
Except by supply while retreating...
or routed units...
or siege engines...


Harakon
Grandmaester of Reports

Posts: 3,634
Games: 903
Rank Points: 3,430
Member since: 2014-Aug-24

Topic: Mace vs. Blackfish
Posted: 2015-Jun-05 14:46
Since retreat is after the fight my statement is still right



Please log in to use the reply function.
toast